Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:52

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nicotine Has a Bad Rap. There Might Be Some Very Good Health Uses for It. - Slate Magazine
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Drinking coffee could help you age better, according to this Harvard study. - Stewartville Star
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What a list actors/ actresses are notorious for being jerks in real life?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are the best products for oily skin in Pakistan?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Over 46,000 Grafana instances exposed to account takeover bug - BleepingComputer
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is your review on the Last of Us Part 2?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.